Close-out Amount - 1992 ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|isda|}}Now the dirty secret is that there ''isn’t'' a “Close-out Amount” as such under a {{1992ma}} but, in places on this wiki, we’ll refer to one anyway, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than “the amount determined following early termination of a {{isda92prov|Terminated Transaction}} using {{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} or {{isda92prov|Loss}} ([[as the case may be]]) and the {{isda92prov|Second Method}}, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the {{isda92prov|First Method}}, under the {{1992ma}}”. In the context of a {{1992ma}} that is what we mean by “Close-out Amount”.
{{nman|isda|1992|Close-out Amount}}Now the dirty secret is that there ''isn’t'' a “Close-out Amount” as such under a {{1992ma}} but, in places on this wiki, we’ll refer to one anyway, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than “the amount determined following early termination of a {{isda92prov|Terminated Transaction}} using {{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} or {{isda92prov|Loss}} ([[as the case may be]]) and the {{isda92prov|Second Method}}, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the {{isda92prov|First Method}}, under the {{1992ma}}”. In the context of a {{1992ma}} that is what we mean by “Close-out Amount”.


{{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} is the shorthand term, introduced in the {{2002ma}} for the value you get from terminating {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s on a, well, close-out. The {{icds}} of the [[First Men]], were less committed to Ellroyesque machine-gun prose than were their millennial successors, you see.
{{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} is the shorthand term, introduced in the {{2002ma}} for the value you get from terminating {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s on a, well, close-out. The {{icds}} of the [[First Men]], were less committed to Ellroyesque machine-gun prose than were their millennial successors, you see.