|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{a|isda|}}Now the dirty secret is that there ''isn’t'' a “Close-out Amount” as such under a {{1992ma}} but, in places, on this wiki we’ll refer to one, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than “the amount determined following early termination of a {{isda92prov|Terminated Transaction}} using {{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} or {{isda92prov|Loss}} ([[as the case may be]]) and the {{isda92prov|Second Method}}, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the {{isda92prov|First Method}}, under the {{1992ma}}”. | | {{nman|isda|1992|Close-out Amount}} |
| | |
| Close-out Amount is the shorthand term, introduced in the {{2002ma}} for the value you get from terminating Transactions on a, well, close-out. The {{icds}} of the First Men, were less committed to Ellroyesque machine-gun prose than were there Millennial successors, you see. | |
| | |
| {{Sa}}
| |
| *{{isda92prov|Market Quotation}}
| |
| *{{isda92prov|Loss}}
| |
| *{{isda92prov|Terminated Transaction}}
| |
| *The [[First Men]]
| |