|
|
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanatopen|isda|{{nuts|2002 ISDA|Close-out Amount}}<br>{{2002ma}} full text: <br>{{ISDA Master Agreement 2002 Close-out Amount}}}} | | {{newisdamanual|Close-out Amount}} |
| From the [[you'll be sorry you asked]] file. Have a butchers at the nutshell version on the right:
| |
| If, having read that, you're still not really feeling sorry, the full text (below) right might get your remorse radar pinging.
| |
| | |
| Close-out amount as a concept was introduced in the {{2002ma}} and doesn't exist under the {{1992ma}}. Instead, in the good old days, terminated transactions were valued according to {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} or {{isdaprov|Loss}} and those utterly unintuitive [[First Method - ISDA Provision|first]] and [[Second Method - ISDA Provision|second]] methods.
| |
| | |
| There are some local variations which are worth bearing in mind:
| |
| ==={{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} and Italian counterparties===
| |
| See for more detail, here: [[Close-out Amount - ISDA Provision/Italian counterparties|Italian counterparties]]
| |
| ===Releationship with Early Termination Amount===
| |
| For those curious about {{isdaprov|the difference between the Early Termination Amount and the Close-out Amount}} in the {{2002ma}}, look no further than back there, along the sentence you've just read. Go on!
| |
| {{seealso}}
| |
| *{{isia}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Market Quotation}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Loss}}
| |
| {{isdacomparison}} <br />
| |