82,891
edits
Close-out Amount - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Close-out amount as a concept was introduced in the {{2002ma}} and doesn't exist under the {{1992ma}}. Instead, in the good old days, terminated transactions were valued according to {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} or {{isdaprov|Loss}} and those utterly unintuitive [[First Method - ISDA Provision|first]] and [[Second Method - ISDA Provision|second]] methods. | Close-out amount as a concept was introduced in the {{2002ma}} and doesn't exist under the {{1992ma}}. Instead, in the good old days, terminated transactions were valued according to {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} or {{isdaprov|Loss}} and those utterly unintuitive [[First Method - ISDA Provision|first]] and [[Second Method - ISDA Provision|second]] methods. | ||
Note prominent requirement to achieve a [[commercially reasonable]] result. On what that means see {{casenote|Barclays|Uncredit}}. | |||
There are some local variations which are worth bearing in mind: | There are some local variations which are worth bearing in mind: | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
*{{isdaprov|Loss}} | *{{isdaprov|Loss}} | ||
{{isdacomparison}} <br /> | {{isdacomparison}} <br /> | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{casenote|Barclays|Uncredit}} | |||
*[[Commercially reasonable manner]] | |||