Close-out netting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Be careful to distinguish between '''[[Settlement netting]]''' (also known as '''[[Payment netting]]''') - which is an operational convenience gladly applied during the life of a derivatives trading relationship, and [[Close-out netting]] which is applied, with a heavy heart, by a non-defaulting party under Section {{isdaprov|6}} of the {{isdama}} when things have turned to custard.''
{{a|glossary|}}''Be careful to distinguish between '''[[Settlement netting]]''' (also known as '''[[Payment netting]]''') - which is an operational convenience gladly applied during the life of a derivatives trading relationship, and [[Close-out netting]] which is applied, with a heavy heart, by a non-defaulting party under Section {{isdaprov|6}} of the {{isdama}} when things have turned to custard.''
 
''See — for a grossly cynical view — the [[Red Flag Act]]''
=== Introduction ===
=== Introduction ===
[[Close-out netting]] is the process of doing that under a [[master agreement]] such as the {{isdama}} when one party defaults. Because an {{isdama}} may have many {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s under it, some with positive and some with negative [[mark-to-market]] exposures, the ability to “net down” all these exposures to a single net sum is important when calculating risk weighting.  
[[Close-out netting]] is the process of doing that under a [[master agreement]] such as the {{isdama}} when one party defaults. Because an {{isdama}} may have many {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s under it, some with positive and some with negative [[mark-to-market]] exposures, the ability to “net down” all these exposures to a single net sum is important when calculating risk weighting.  


In order to achieve that "net" treatment under relevant regulations — there are a lot of them; locally, regionally, and under Basel etcone must have legal opinions from all relevant jurisdictions that the "close out netting" would be effective in the insolvency of the counterparty.  
In order to achieve that “net” treatment under relevant regulations — there are a lot of them; locally, regionally, and under the [[Basel Accords|Basel banking accords]] etc one must have [[legal opinion|legal opinions]] from all relevant jurisdictions that the “[[close out netting]]” would be effective in the [[insolvency]] of the counterparty.  


{{set-off and netting}}
{{set-off and netting}}
{{assignment and set off}}
{{assignment and set off}}
 
{{netting between english entities}}
For a discussion of what "closing out" is and how it works in various types of Master Agreement, see:
For a discussion of what “closing out” is and how it works in various types of Master Agreement, see:
*{{isdaprov|Early Termination}} under the {{isdama}}
*{{isdaprov|Early Termination}} under the {{isdama}}
*[[GMSLA Netting]] under the {{gmsla}}
*[[GMSLA Netting]] under the {{gmsla}}
{{anat|isda}}
{{sa}}
*[[Automatic early termination]]
*{{Isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}
{{ref}}
{{ref}}