Clunge v Rentier

The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service. Go Premium Editorial Board of the JCLR: Managing Editor: Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. · General Editor: Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. · Principle witness: Mrs. Pinterman Common law | Litigation | Contract | Tort | Click ᐅ to expand: Case notes Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you. Sign up for our newsletter.

In the Contrarian’s Bench Division

Clunge v. Rentier [2022] JCLR 60

2022: Oct 31

Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R.

Tort — Disclaimer — Financial Advice — Whether Disclaimer Disclaiming Personal Responsibility and Recommending Independent Advice applied to Itself

Motion to strike out proceedings brought by Sir Anthony Clunge, K.C., plaintiff seeking damages in tort for negligent misstatement against Brandon “Chip” Rentier, defendant, relating to statements made on Social Media.

Dame Marjorie Wrigley, K.C. for the appellant
Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C., for the respondent

(Cur adv. vult)

Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R.: The information revolution has wrought transformations upon our society the like of which have not been seen since Savory invented the steam turbine in 1698.