Co-head: Difference between revisions

Co-head (view source)

Revision as of 15:23, 8 August 2022

794 bytes added , 8 August 2022

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

81,898

edits

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ===Rationale===
-Purported rationales are to encourage a lean market inside the organisation for ideas, and to sort wheat from chaff. Pitting two young thrusters against each other is some sort of Spartan matriculation:  soon enough, one will emerge and the other will expire in the cage, a mess of blooded feathers. This is how [[Goldman]] looks at it, anyway. If that is how you do your succession planning, fair enough — but you reap what you sow.
+Purported rationales are to encourage a lean market inside the organisation for ideas, and to sort wheat from chaff.
+Those captive of the [[libtard]]s in [[personnel]] may claim this as some modern commitment to consensus and [[diversity and inclusion|diversity]]. Time Magazine bought it hook, line and sinker:
+{{Quote|“Having more than one person at the helm means more opportunity for a company to infuse its top ranks with [[diversity]] in all aspects, including age, race, gender, and skillset, as well as more experience with management, communications, and digital prowess.”<ref>[https://time.com/charter/6200510/shared-leadership/ The Case For Having More Than One Person in Charge], ''Time'', 22 July 2022.</ref>}}
+But no-one, outside [[HR]], with the first clue about human nature<ref>It goes without saying people in human resources have not the first clue about human nature.</ref> buys that. Pitting two young thrusters against each other is some sort of Spartan matriculation: soon enough, one will emerge and the other will expire in the cage, a mess of blooded feathers. This is how [[Goldman]] looks at it, anyway. If that is how you do your succession planning, fair enough — but you reap what you sow.
 This is not how it works in kinder, lazier places where the co-head gambit is a sop from those without the heart for hard decisions that might damage fragile egos.