Co-head: Difference between revisions

132 bytes added ,  13 March 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:


===Rationale===
===Rationale===
Purported rationales are to encourage a lean market inside the organisation for ideas, and to sort wheat from chaff. Pitting two young thrusters against each other is some sort of Spartan matriculation: one will emerge, soon enough, the other will expire in the cage in a mess of blooded feathers. This is how Goldman looks at it, anyway. Elsewhere, kinder places, it is a symptom of the failure to weed out senior players who have passed their use-by date, but no-one can    
Purported rationales are to encourage a lean market inside the organisation for ideas, and to sort wheat from chaff. Pitting two young thrusters against each other is some sort of Spartan matriculation: soon enough, one will emerge and the other will expire in the cage, a mess of blooded feathers. This is how [[Goldman]] looks at it, anyway. If that is how you do your succession planning, fair enough — but you reap what you sow.   
 
This is not how it works in kinder, lazier places where the co-head gambit is a sop from those without the heart for hard decisions that might damage fragile egos.    


{{sa}}
{{sa}}