83,040
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Which has left some institutions with a curly question when it transpires that the lion’s share of the spoils, the titles, the promotions and executive suite positions unerringly, go to the same kinds of homogeneous straight white men. This ''cannot'' be right, can it? | Which has left some institutions with a curly question when it transpires that the lion’s share of the spoils, the titles, the promotions and executive suite positions unerringly, go to the same kinds of homogeneous straight white men. This ''cannot'' be right, can it? | ||
It cannot. It is a major, stubborn, persistent mystery | It cannot. It is a major, stubborn, persistent mystery. It eludes every observer of the financial markets that the [[JC]] is aware of. Not even Jordan Peterson can explain it. Not just that the titans of commerce are overwhelmingly straight, white and male — they are, but ''someone''’s got to be, and they can hardly help it, can they? — but that, especially given the lengths the collective goes to find the best people, so many of the ones it winds up with are so ''mediocre''. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Diversity]] | *[[Diversity]] | ||
*[[Performance appraisal]] | *[[Performance appraisal]] |