|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{eqderivanat|12.5}} | | {{eqdmanual|12.5}} |
| The pedantrous may ask to remove references to the {{eqderivprov|Calculation Agent}}’s [[Sole and absolute discretion|sole discretion]]. Get your kicks — it’s doubtful that makes any difference: making a determination without specifically saying how you should do it implies you’ll make it up on the fly. What is your counter argument, when the calculation makes a determination you don’t like, meant to be.
| |
| | |
| “Oh! you used your discretion! you were supposed to ask me!” <br>
| |
| “No I wasn’t.” <br>
| |
| “Oh, yes you were!” <br>
| |
| “Where does it say that?”<br>
| |
| | |
| Here follows a large pause, wherein negotiator realises that removing the words “, in its sole discretion,” doesn’t achieve anything.
| |
| | |
| “... Well it doesn't say you ''weren’t'' meant to ask me ...” <br>
| |
| | |
| You know where this is heading, don’t you. Come on: let's go there, for old time’s sake.
| |
| | |
| “''Where''?” did I hear you say? I can scarce believe it.
| |
| | |
| Oh come on, “where?” indeed. ''[[Video nasty|You know where]]''.
| |
| | |
| {{seealso}}
| |
| *[[Discretion]]
| |
| *[[Sole and absolute discretion]]
| |