Conclusive evidence clause: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
Now, these days indemnities are thrown around willy nilly by all kinds of [[mediocre lawyer|moron]] in the capital markets business, to cover all kinds of inappropriately indeterminate things. It will not shock me if I see an indemnity claimed for “any and all losses, costs, damages, liabilities, disbursements, expenses claims of whatever kind we may experience at any time merely as a function of drawing a breath”.
Now, these days indemnities are thrown around willy nilly by all kinds of [[mediocre lawyer|moron]] in the capital markets business, to cover all kinds of inappropriately indeterminate things. It will not shock me if I see an indemnity claimed for “any and all losses, costs, damages, liabilities, disbursements, expenses claims of whatever kind we may experience at any time merely as a function of drawing a breath”.


I mean, go for your life. Good luck enforcing that. And, really, good luck trying to stick in a clause saying {{quote|In the absence of [[manifest error]], a certificate from the Lender as to any such “Loss” will be conclusive evidence of the amount owing.}}
I mean, go for your life. Good luck enforcing that. And, really, good luck trying to stick in a clause saying “In the absence of [[manifest error]], a certificate from the Lender as to any such “Loss” will be conclusive evidence of the amount owing.” and getting anyone to agree it or, if they do, a court to pay it any attention.
 


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[Manifest error]]
*[[Manifest error]]