82,890
edits
Confidentiality agreement: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|confi| | {{a|confi| | ||
[[File:Secret.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Do you promise not to tell, and if you do, do you acknowledge damages may not be an adequate remedy?]] | [[File:Secret.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Do you promise not to tell, and if you do, do you acknowledge damages may not be an adequate remedy?]] | ||
}}Also known, to those for whom the glass is half-empty, as a [[non-disclosure agreement]]. An agreement whereby you promise not to tell | }}Also known, to those for whom the glass is half-empty, as a [[non-disclosure agreement]]. An agreement whereby you promise not to tell. Here are the main parts of a normal financial markets [[confidentiality agreement]].<ref>If you are a Hollywood Exec type who expects, turpitudinously, to hush up people you have triggered, you have come to the wrong place. This is about the ''good'' kind of [[NDA]]. The ''nice'' one. </ref> | ||
{{confi basic structure}} | {{confi basic structure}} | ||
==What’s in a [[confi]]?== | |||
Confis can be “one way”, where one party discloses and the other receives, or “two way”, where both parties disclose sensitive information. A [[broker]]’s template will tend to be far more generous when it is receiving only, than when it is giving information up. I know this may come as a shock to some of you. | Confis can be “one way”, where one party discloses and the other receives, or “two way”, where both parties disclose sensitive information. A [[broker]]’s template will tend to be far more generous when it is receiving only, than when it is giving information up. I know this may come as a shock to some of you. | ||
====Length==== | ====Length==== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
*A [[non-solicitation clause]] | *A [[non-solicitation clause]] | ||
*An [[indemnity]] | *An [[indemnity]] | ||
===Special AKA=== | ===Special AKA=== | ||