Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|boilerplate|
{{a|boilerplate|
[[File:Third man.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Why the hostility towards third parties, [[counsellor]]? What did they ever to do you?]]
[[File:Third man.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Why the hostility towards third parties, [[counsellor]]? What did they ever to do you?]]
{{subtable|Sample [[CRTPA]] clause:<br>No one who is not a party to this agreement has any rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce any of its terms.}}}}It is now lost in the mists of history, but once upon a time there must have been a reason why lawyers of the international capital markets were so collectively hostile to the [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999]], a small piece of well-intended legislation which allowed contractual parties to agree that persons benefiting from their contract, but who were not parties to it (and thus did not have the necessary “[[privity of contract]]” required by the [[common law]] to take action under it), might, upon a breach, be allowed to sue the breaching party directly to recover their loss.
{{subtable|'''Sample [[CRTPA]] clause''':<br>No one who is not a party to this agreement has any rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce any of its terms.}}}}It is now lost in the mists of history, but once upon a time there must have been a reason why lawyers of the international capital markets were so collectively hostile to the [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999]], a small piece of well-intended legislation which allowed contractual parties to agree that persons benefiting from their contract, but who were not parties to it (and thus did not have the necessary “[[privity of contract]]” required by the [[common law]] to take action under it), might, upon a breach, be allowed to sue the breaching party directly to recover their loss.


Look, who could possibly object to that worthy goal?
Look, who could possibly object to that worthy goal?