Contractual damages: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|contract|}}
{{a|contract|{{subtable|{{small|80}}{{loss v damages}}</div>}}}}The measure of [[compensation]] one can expect as a result of another’s [[breach of contract]]. This is generally targeted at putting the claimant in the ''financial'' position it would have been in had the naughty little rabbit performed its obligations up to expectation. Financial, not physical: the common law could not generally insist on performance as such — for that, you need the [[equitable remedy]] of [[specific performance]].
The measure of [[compensation]] one can expect as a result of another’s [[breach of contract]]. This is generally targeted at putting the claimant in the ''financial'' position it would have been in had the naughty little rabbit performed its obligations up to expectation. Financial, not physical: the common law could not generally insist on performance as such — for that, you need the [[equitable remedy]] of [[specific performance]].


These ordinary principles apply pragmatically to limit the damages a party must pay to what is reasonable for what that party was responsible.
These ordinary principles apply pragmatically to limit the damages a party must pay to what is reasonable for what that party was responsible.
Line 17: Line 16:
These include the direct and foreseeable losses of a contract. If I have loaned you £100 against the collateral of your car, and you default, my damages are £100 ''minus'' the realised value of the car (£50 — it was a crappy car). These could conceivably by consequential losses — loss of profit and so on — provided it was genuinely within the contemplation of the parties, foreseeable, determinate and so on. Since consequential losses are of their nature indeterminate, it is very hard to get them awarded in normal circumstances.
These include the direct and foreseeable losses of a contract. If I have loaned you £100 against the collateral of your car, and you default, my damages are £100 ''minus'' the realised value of the car (£50 — it was a crappy car). These could conceivably by consequential losses — loss of profit and so on — provided it was genuinely within the contemplation of the parties, foreseeable, determinate and so on. Since consequential losses are of their nature indeterminate, it is very hard to get them awarded in normal circumstances.
====[[Special damages]]====
====[[Special damages]]====
These are the direct out-of pocket costs of mitigating your loss. So, the £15 commission I had to pay wesellanycrappymotor.com to hock off your car for £50. Again, bear in mind the point is to put the innocent one in the position she would have been had the contract been performed. She would not have had to sell that car, so this is fair enough,and reasonably foreseeable, determinate and so on.
{{special damages capsule}}
====[[Aggravated damages]]====
====[[Aggravated damages]]====
To compensate the defendant for mental distress
To compensate the defendant for mental distress
Line 28: Line 27:
*[[Causation]]
*[[Causation]]
*[[Consequential loss]]
*[[Consequential loss]]
{{ref}}