82,891
edits
Contractual negligence: Difference between revisions
→What about concurrent liability in Tort and Contract?
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
{{Box|Bill borrows Ben's car. He agrees to return it to Ben on Thursday at 3pm. At the appointed time Bill presents himself to Ben, but announces that he has just been mugged, and the car has been stolen. His mugger was quite unexpected, applied overwhelming force, and immediately drove the car into a wall and wrote it off. Through no fault of his own, Bill is unable to perform his obligation. Should he be able to rely on a carve out from liability because he has not been negligent?}} | {{Box|Bill borrows Ben's car. He agrees to return it to Ben on Thursday at 3pm. At the appointed time Bill presents himself to Ben, but announces that he has just been mugged, and the car has been stolen. His mugger was quite unexpected, applied overwhelming force, and immediately drove the car into a wall and wrote it off. Through no fault of his own, Bill is unable to perform his obligation. Should he be able to rely on a carve out from liability because he has not been negligent?}} | ||
====What about concurrent liability in | ====What about [[concurrent liability]] in [[tort]] and [[contract]]?==== | ||
{{concurrent liability}} | {{concurrent liability}} | ||