Contractual negligence: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|glossary|}}An attorney eyes you wistfully and slides a draft across the table to you. It includes the following:
{{a|glossary|[[File:Contractual loss.PNG|450px|center|Damage against Wantonness. Mapped.]]}}An attorney eyes you wistfully and slides a draft across the table to you. It includes the following:
:''My client shall not be liable for any losses, howsoever caused, unless they arise directly from its own {{tag|negligence}}, {{tag|fraud}} or {{tag|wilful default}}.''
:''My client shall not be liable for any losses, howsoever caused, unless they arise directly from its own {{tag|negligence}}, {{tag|fraud}} or {{tag|wilful default}}.''


Line 9: Line 9:


==={{tag|Fraud}}===
==={{tag|Fraud}}===
[[File:Contractual loss.PNG|450px|thumb|right|Damage against Wantonness. Mapped.]]
You ''can’t'' exclude contractual liability for fraud: to do so is to step beyond the hermeneutic boundaries of the game one plays in entering a legal arrangement<ref>{{google|Gadamer}}</ref>. A contract where, by its terms, one could behave fraudulently would be an arch affair.  So it’s hardly a great concession to say so.
You ''can’t'' exclude contractual liability for fraud: to do so is to step beyond the hermeneutic boundaries of the game one plays in entering a legal arrangement<ref>{{google|Gadamer}}</ref>. A contract where, by its terms, one could behave fraudulently would be an arch affair.  So it’s hardly a great concession to say so.