Corporate actions - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (Text replace - "{{gmslaanatomy}}" to "{{anat|gmsla}}")
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{gmslasnap|6.7}}
{{Manual|MSG|2010|6.7|Clause|6.4|medium}}
====Commentary====
 
Compare Clause {{gmsla2000prov|6.3}} of the {{2000gmsla}}
 
There is a slight tension between {{gmslaprov|6.5}} and {{gmslaprov|6.6}}: while a {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is not obliged to vote in a certain way, if it does so and acquires a certain benefit ''and the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} requests'', it has to pass over that benefit. Best illustrated by way of example:
 
{{box|{{italianwithdrawalright}}}}
 
In this case the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} who has lent out over the [[record date]] could not (without prior agreement) oblige the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} to vote against the {{tag|merger}}, but if the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} has done so, the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} can, by request under {{gmslaprov|6.7}}, require the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} to deliver the proceeds of the withdrawal in lieu of {{gmslaprov|Equivalent}} {{gmslaprov|Securities}}.
 
====See Also====
 
{{anat|gmsla}}