Corporate actions - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions

Corporate actions - GMSLA Provision (view source)

8 bytes removed , 17 July 2018

no edit summary

82,853

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{fullanat|gmsla|6.7|2010}}
+{{gmslaanat|6.7}}
-Compare Clause {{gmsla2000prov|6.3}} of the {{2000gmsla}}
+''Compare Clause {{gmsla2000prov|6.3}} of the {{2000gmsla}}''
-There is a slight tension between {{gmslaprov|6.5}} and {{gmslaprov|6.6}}: while a {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is not obliged to vote in a certain way, if it does so and acquires a certain benefit ''and the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} requests'', it has to pass over that benefit. Best illustrated by way of example:
+There is a  tension between {{gmslaprov|6.5}} and {{gmslaprov|6.6}}: while a {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is not obliged to ''vote'' in a certain way, if it does so and acquires a certain benefit ''and the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} requests'', it has to pass over that benefit. Best illustrated by way of example:
 {{box|{{italianwithdrawalright}}}}
 In this case the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} who has lent out over the [[record date]] could not (without prior agreement) oblige the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} to vote against the {{tag|merger}}, but if the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} has done so, the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} can, by request under {{gmslaprov|6.7}}, require the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} to deliver the proceeds of the withdrawal in lieu of {{gmslaprov|Equivalent}} {{gmslaprov|Securities}}.