Cost reduction: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|negotiation|}}{{wasteprov|Cost}}s may arise largely as follows:
{{a|negotiation|}}Cost is not the opposite of (monetisable) value. A process may have a value ''because'' there is a cost to it. If you get rid of the cost, you get rid of the value. This is why no-one could make money out of email. It took away a cost, and meant the monetisable value of the abstract action of sending and receiving written communication dropped to nil.
 
 
{{wasteprov|Cost}}s may arise largely as follows:
==={{wasteprov|Personnel}}===
==={{wasteprov|Personnel}}===
{{wasteprov|Personnel}} from [[Sales]], [[KYC]], [[Onboarding]], [[Credit]], [[Trading]], [[Tax]], [[Legal]]/[[Negotiation]], [[Operations]]. Costs include hidden costs like pension, redundancy expenses, national insurance and so on. [[All other things being equal]],<ref>The {{wasteprov|fungibility}} of {{wasteprov|personnel}} is a popular falsehood of [[management consultancy]].</ref> you can address these {{wasteprov|cost}}s as follows:
{{wasteprov|Personnel}} from [[Sales]], [[KYC]], [[Onboarding]], [[Credit]], [[Trading]], [[Tax]], [[Legal]]/[[Negotiation]], [[Operations]]. Costs include hidden costs like pension, redundancy expenses, national insurance and so on. [[All other things being equal]],<ref>The {{wasteprov|fungibility}} of {{wasteprov|personnel}} is a popular falsehood of [[management consultancy]].</ref> you can address these {{wasteprov|cost}}s as follows: