82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*[[consideration]] | *[[consideration]] | ||
Here we are talking about [[acceptance]]. Acceptance does not require | Here we are talking about [[acceptance]]. Acceptance does not require a quill. It does not need a signature (digital [[or otherwise]]) at all. One may accept [[orally]], by gesture, or even just by behaving in a way that can only be explained by reference the putative contract being argued about. All a counterparty needs to do is satisfy a court that one communicated acceptance. | ||
Signature is about ''[[evidence]]'' of that acceptance. | Signature is about ''[[evidence]]'' of that acceptance. Parties signing different copies of the same contract is no less compelling evidence than both signing the same one. | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Counterparts and Confirmations - ISDA Provision]] | *[[Counterparts and Confirmations - ISDA Provision]] |