Counterparts: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
A signature is simply ''[[evidence]]'' of that [[acceptance]]. Parties signing different copies of the same contract is no less compelling evidence than both signing the same one.
A signature is simply ''[[evidence]]'' of that [[acceptance]]. Parties signing different copies of the same contract is no less compelling evidence than both signing the same one.


Note, also, that where formal execution requirements ''do'' require every hand to besmirch the same physical parchment, a [[counterparts]] clause won’t save you. This is [[Magic incantation|deep magic]], and no beginner’s spell will shoo it away. So the logical utility for a counterparts clause runs like this:
Note, also, that where formal execution requirements ''do'' require every hand to besmirch the same physical parchment, a [[counterparts]] clause won’t save you. This is [[Magic incantation|deep magic]], and no beginner’s spell will shoo it away.  


Is the {{t|contract}} a [[deed]] of lease?  
===A handy flow-chart===
:''No'': You don’t need a [[counterparts]] clause. You can safely sign in as many [[counterparts]] as you like without one.
You can map the logical utility of a [[counterparts]] clause like this:
:''Yes'': A [[counterparts]] clause won’t work.  You all have to sign the same document.
 
:''Is the {{t|contract}} a [[deed]] of lease''?  
::''No'': You don’t need a [[counterparts]] clause. You can safely sign in as many [[counterparts]] as you like without one.
::''Yes'': A [[counterparts]] clause won’t work.  You all have to sign the same document.


===Odd spot===
===Odd spot===