82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|boilerplate|[[File:Counterparts.jpg|thumb|center| | {{a|boilerplate|[[File:Counterparts.jpg|thumb|center|450|This is what difficult rehearsals looks like.]]}}Outside the arcane and stupefying word of conveyancing, a [[Counterparts and Confirmations - ISDA Provision|counterparts]] clause is a waste of trees. Indeed: even there, it is a waste of trees, because it won’t work. Let that not stop your [[legal eagle]]s insisting on one, on pain of cratering the trade altogether, of course: a fellow has to put food on the table for his younglings. | ||
Black’s Law dictionary has the following to say on [[counterparts]]: | Black’s Law dictionary has the following to say on [[counterparts]]: |