82,891
edits
Counterparts: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{counterparts capsule}} | {{counterparts capsule}} | ||
===Are you, like, ''sure''?=== | ===Are you, like, ''sure''?=== | ||
It is fun counting the client bulletins that say “while a counterparts clause may not be strictly necessary, it ''is'' [[best practice]].” Not for long, but for about five minutes. Then you realise they all say this. | It is fun counting the client bulletins that say “while a counterparts clause may not be strictly necessary, it ''is'' [[best practice]].” Not for long, but for about five minutes. Then you realise they ''all'' say this. But it ''isn''’t best practice. It is ''stupid'' practice. It is feeble, lawyering by rote. It is not-quite-[[premium mediocre]]. | ||
''Normal'' contracts — even spicy ones, like [[deed]]s<ref>See [http://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/signed-sealed-delivered-execution-of-deeds-and-documents-and-how-it-might-go-wrong/ Osborne Clarke] as authority for this.</ref> — ''do not need a counterparts clause''. | ''Normal'' contracts — even spicy ones, like [[deed]]s<ref>See [http://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/signed-sealed-delivered-execution-of-deeds-and-documents-and-how-it-might-go-wrong/ Osborne Clarke] as authority for this.</ref> — ''do not need a counterparts clause''. | ||