Covenant to pay: Difference between revisions

1,410 bytes removed ,  3 October 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|repack|{{subtable|{{repackprov|Covenant to pay}} in a {{nutshell}}
{{essay|repack|covenant to pay|{{aisegment}}{{subtable|{{repackprov|Covenant to pay}} in a {{nutshell}}
{{small|80}}On or following any date on which any Principal, Interest or deliveries become due under the Notes, the Issuer will pay or deliver them unconditionally upon demand, to the Trustee’s order.


The Issuer must unconditionally pay principal when it becomes due in the Contractual Currency, with interest, as set out in the Conditions.
''[The Issuer can satisfy that obligation by payment to the Issuing and Paying Agent, provided the Issuing and Paying Agent then pays Noteholders.]''<ref>We bracket this bit because it is common, but we think, a bit stupid. Discussed in more detail in the {{premium}}.</ref>
The Issuer can satisfy that obligation by payment to the Issuing and Paying Agent, provided the Issuing and Paying Agent then pays Noteholders.


The Trustee holds this covenant on trust for the Noteholders.}}}}You might wonder what on ''Earth'' this is all about, especially if you encounter it cast with the wrought iron prose  that the school matron beats into Linklaters trainees with her rolling pin during their Debt Capital Markets seat.
The Trustee holds this covenant on trust for the Noteholders.</div>}}}}
 
So, in brief:
===What the covenant to pay is all about===
The note is a [[unilateral contract|unilateral]], [[bearer instrument]]. Holders for the time being appoint a trustee to represent them.
 
The trustee does not hold the note, so otherwise would have no rights under it. This covenant gives the trustee legal standing to sue/act for noteholders.
 
Also, the issuer makes its payments to noteholders via a [[paying agent]] (normally, a bank). There is an odd interregnum between the issuer paying its agent, and the agent paying the noteholders, which it does through [[Clearing system|clearing systems]]
 
The issuer’s covenant is discharged by paying the principal it owes to its agent. At that point it has done everything it can do.
 
But if the agent then fails before paying noteholders — it can happen — the issuer should not be discharged from its obligation to the noteholders. One cannot escape liability to a principal by giving money to your own agent.
 
At this point, the noteholders have a claim for default against the issuer, and the issuer has a claim against its (insolvent) paying agent.
 
The trustee holds the covenant on trust for  noteholders (and itself to the extent of its own fees) to defend against trustee running off with the money: under the trust noteholders can trace  their claims in the trustee’s hands if the trustee does a bolter.
 
{{Sa}}
*[[Signal versus noise]]