|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{isdaanat|5(a)(iii)}} | | {{newisdamanual|5(a)(iii)}} |
| Note the charming contingency thast ISDA allows that the counterparty might default under a credit assurance offered by someone else altogether.
| |
| | |
| Before you even put your hand up: no, a [[Credit Support Annex]] between the two counterparties is ''not'' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}. It is a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}.
| |