Credit Support Document - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Note also the pitfalls of providing [[Guarantee]]s with respect to individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s under an {{isdama}}. It doesn't work. [[Guarantee|Here's why]].
Note also the pitfalls of providing [[Guarantee]]s with respect to individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s under an {{isdama}}. It doesn't work. [[Guarantee|Here's why]].


==[[Guarantees]] under the {{isdama}} and why a Transaction-Specific guarantee is a bad idea==
==[[Guarantees]] under the {{isdama}} and why a {{isdaprov|Transaction}}-specific {{isdaprov|guarantee}} is a bad idea==
{{isdaguaranteewarning}}
 
 
Should a client request a transaction-specific parental guarantee under an {{isdama}} instead of the usual “all obligations” guarantee of all obligations under the {{isdama}} and all transactions under it, escalate immediately.  
Should a client request a transaction-specific parental guarantee under an {{isdama}} instead of the usual “all obligations” guarantee of all obligations under the {{isdama}} and all transactions under it, escalate immediately.  


Line 17: Line 20:


*Therefore, if the guarantee relates to the single {{isdaprov|Transaction}} only, at precisely the point you wish to rely on it (i.e., upon the party’s default), it will vanish. Same goes for Letters of Credit.
*Therefore, if the guarantee relates to the single {{isdaprov|Transaction}} only, at precisely the point you wish to rely on it (i.e., upon the party’s default), it will vanish. Same goes for Letters of Credit.
{{isdaanatomy}}


{{isdaanatomy}}
{{isdaanatomy}}