Debt: The First 5,000 Years: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
Playfully, Graeber introduces the notion of “everyday communism” — he could, less provocatively, have called it “communalism”, but where’s the fun in that — as an alternative to a life of sterile, impersonal, perfectly quantified transactions. By this, he did not mean Bolshevism, but something more prosaic: our general disposition help each other out without question where the relative personal cost is not great. This stance: to be a [[good egg]] — to co-operate and not defect — is deeper and more critical to interpersonal relationships than are the outcomes of economic transactions which, rather, ''depend'' on that basic layer of probity.  
Playfully, Graeber introduces the notion of “everyday communism” — he could, less provocatively, have called it “communalism”, but where’s the fun in that — as an alternative to a life of sterile, impersonal, perfectly quantified transactions. By this, he did not mean Bolshevism, but something more prosaic: our general disposition help each other out without question where the relative personal cost is not great. This stance: to be a [[good egg]] — to co-operate and not defect — is deeper and more critical to interpersonal relationships than are the outcomes of economic transactions which, rather, ''depend'' on that basic layer of probity.  


{{quote|“If someone fixing a broken water pipe says, ‘Hand me the wrench,’ his co-worker will not, generally speaking, say, “and what do I get for it?’”}}
{{quote|“If someone fixing a broken water pipe says, ‘hand me the wrench,’ his co-worker will not, generally speaking, say, ‘and what do I get for it?’”}}


Yet monetarist orthodoxy cannot see it, and therefore treats it as imaginary.
Yet monetarist orthodoxy cannot see it, and therefore treats it as imaginary.