82,927
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
To incentivise parents to pick up their kids on time, the centre introduced a small but meaningful “late fee” for those who were more than ten minutes late. But rather than this reducing late pick-ups, average delinquency in those centres ''doubled''. What happened? The Gneezy surmises: the fixed penalty put a ''monetary value'' on the inconvenience: it converted a ''moral'' obligation into a ''financial'' one. In doing so something meaningful was lost. | To incentivise parents to pick up their kids on time, the centre introduced a small but meaningful “late fee” for those who were more than ten minutes late. But rather than this reducing late pick-ups, average delinquency in those centres ''doubled''. What happened? The Gneezy surmises: the fixed penalty put a ''monetary value'' on the inconvenience: it converted a ''moral'' obligation into a ''financial'' one. In doing so something meaningful was lost. | ||
That something is the motivating force behind this highly entertaining, learned, and stimulating book. David Graeber’s history —and there’s plenty of history, right back to the myth — yes, myth — of the foundation of money in barter — poses this central question: what happens when we reduce our sense of morality and justice to the language of a business deal? | That something is the motivating force behind this highly entertaining, learned, and stimulating book. David Graeber’s history —and there’s plenty of history, right back to the myth — yes, myth — of the foundation of money in [[barter]] — poses this central question: what happens when we reduce our sense of morality and justice to the language of a business deal? | ||
“What,” Graeber asks in the first chapter, “does it mean when we reduce moral obligations to debts?” | “What,” Graeber asks in the first chapter, “does it mean when we reduce moral obligations to debts?” |