|
|
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat2|isda|2(d)|2002|2(d)|1992}} | | {{newisdamanual|2(d)|}} |
| | |
| You can revel in the full heft of these provisions in below. Observant and obedient scholars will notice that the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} versions are, more or less, identical. Observant and less obedient scholars will remark what a pig’s ear the ISDA drafting committee made of a relatively simple concept and, given a once-in-a-decade opportunity to improve it in 2002, the combined intellectual might of ISDA, its members, friends and relations, and their divers [[mediocre lawyer|counsel]], retinue and entourage, couldn’t. Or didn’t.
| |
| | |
| This is, therefore, the apex of all possible derivatives drafting. Especially the triple negative in {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}. Make you feel great to be alive, doesn’t it. I bet you wish it could be simplified. Here: let *me* have a go.
| |
| {{nuts|ISDA|Gross-Up}}
| |
| | |
| {{Withholding under ISDA}}
| |