|
|
(30 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{tocbuilder|ISDA|2002|2(d)}} | | {{newisdamanual|2(d)|}} |
| | |
| ==Commentary==
| |
| Observant and diligent scholars will notice that these two clauses are, more or less, identical.
| |
| | |
| Observant and less obedient scholars will remark how much of a pig's ear the ISDA drafting committee can make of drafting a relatively simple concept and, given a once-in-a-decade opportunity to improve its first attempt in the {{1992ma}}, how in 2002 the combined intellectual might of ISDA, its members, friends and relations, and their divers counsel, retinue and entourage, couldn't.
| |
| | |
| This is, therefore, the apex of all possible derivatives drafting. Make you feel great to be alive, doesn't it.
| |
| | |
| {{isdaanatomy}}
| |