Definitions and Inconsistency - VM CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

Definitions and Inconsistency - VM CSA Provision (view source)

1 byte added , 27 December 2019

no edit summary

83,022

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{csaanat|1(a)|2016}}A paragraph of unremarkable, if unnecessary, throat-clearing, though marred by a bizarre [[for the avoidance of doubt]] rider which functions as both a ''[[non sequitur|non-sequitur]]'' — no one was talking about transfers here, much less was in any particular state of confusion about them so why bring it up now? — but also the classic self-hack: rather than ''avoiding'' doubt, this rider is [[calculated]] to do nothing quite so much as ''introduce'' it. Wait: was I meant to be doubting something here? Should I have been confused? Have I missed something?
-There is nothing a [[Chicken Licken|cheerful attorney]] likes more than to worry about things, and she will toss sleeplessly for nights on end, fully occupied by questions such as — is “delivery” of cash different from “payment” of it? Is there something legally significant about “payment” that | somehow missed in Banking Law 302, in 1989?
+There is nothing a [[Chicken Licken|cheerful attorney]] likes more than to worry about things, and she will toss sleeplessly for nights on end, fully occupied by questions such as — is “delivery” of cash different from “payment” of it? Is there something legally significant about “payment” that I somehow missed, in Banking Law 302, in 1989?
 {{sa}}
 *[[Cash]]