Definitions and Inconsistency - VM CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

Definitions and Inconsistency - VM CSA Provision (view source)

Revision as of 09:57, 9 January 2020

5 bytes added , 9 January 2020

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

83,040

edits

Revision as of 14:40, 30 December 2019 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:57, 9 January 2020 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{csaanat\|1(a)\|2016}}A paragraph of unremarkable, if unnecessary, [[throat-clearing]], though marred by a bizarre [[for the avoidance of doubt]] rider which functions as both a ''[[non sequitur\|non-sequitur]]'' — no one was talking about transfers here, much less was in any particular state of confusion about them, so why bring it up now? — but also the classic self-hack: rather than ''avoiding'' doubt, this rider is [[calculated]] to do nothing quite so much as ''introduce'' it. Wait: was I meant to be doubting something here? Should I have been confused? Have I missed something?		{{csaanat\|1(a)\|2016\|1(a)}}A paragraph of unremarkable, if unnecessary, [[throat-clearing]], though marred by a bizarre [[for the avoidance of doubt]] rider which functions as both a ''[[non sequitur\|non-sequitur]]'' — no one was talking about transfers here, much less was in any particular state of confusion about them, so why bring it up now? — but also the classic self-hack: rather than ''avoiding'' doubt, this rider is [[calculated]] to do nothing quite so much as ''introduce'' it. Wait: was I meant to be doubting something here? Should I have been confused? Have I missed something?

	There is nothing a [[Chicken Licken\|cheerful attorney]] likes more than to worry about things, and she will toss sleeplessly for nights on end, fully occupied by questions such as — is “[[delivery]]” of [[cash]] different from “payment” of it? Is there something legally significant about “payment” that I somehow missed, in Banking Law 302, in 1989?		There is nothing a [[Chicken Licken\|cheerful attorney]] likes more than to worry about things, and she will toss sleeplessly for nights on end, fully occupied by questions such as — is “[[delivery]]” of [[cash]] different from “payment” of it? Is there something legally significant about “payment” that I somehow missed, in Banking Law 302, in 1989?