Definitions and Inconsistency - VM CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
There is an interesting question as to what this might mean if your [[counterparty]] is also your banker, and you direct it to transfer [[credit support]] into the bank account you maintain with ''it'', meaning that legally the [[counterparty]] hasn’t done anything with the [[cash]] at all — not an unusual scenario, should you be a [[hedge fund]] and the [[counterparty]] your [[prime broker]] — but this will set your [[legal eagle]]s off again, and we don’t want that. We are just getting started.
There is an interesting question as to what this might mean if your [[counterparty]] is also your banker, and you direct it to transfer [[credit support]] into the bank account you maintain with ''it'', meaning that legally the [[counterparty]] hasn’t done anything with the [[cash]] at all — not an unusual scenario, should you be a [[hedge fund]] and the [[counterparty]] your [[prime broker]] — but this will set your [[legal eagle]]s off again, and we don’t want that. We are just getting started.


Note that in the {{nyvmcsa}}, {{nyvmcsaprov|Transfer}} is separately defined, [[U.S. attorney]]s being the completists that they are.
Note that in the {{nyvmcsa}}, {{nyvmcsaprov|Transfer}}is separately defined, [[U.S. attorney]]s being the completists that they are.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
Line 13: Line 13:
*[[Prime broker]]
*[[Prime broker]]
*[[Throat-clearing]]
*[[Throat-clearing]]
*“{{nyvmcsaprov|Transfer}}” under the {{nyvmcsa}}