82,891
edits
Deliveries of Income - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions
Deliveries of Income - GMSLA Provision (view source)
Revision as of 12:42, 8 August 2019
, 8 August 2019no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Just what these customary and appropriate endorsements or assignments might be, and why the [[Manufactured payments in respect of Loaned Securities - GMSLA Provision|manufacturer]] has to grant them, even where the actual securities issuer didn’t, we can only speculate. Perhaps — speculation here — it is because the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is most likely to have immediately sold the {{gmslaprov|Loaned Securities}} into the market — the major purpose of a {{Gmsla}} being short selling, after all — and so won’t ''get'' any {{gmslaprov|Income}} under the shares, much less any “customary endorsements” relating to it, whatever in this day and age that might mean. | Just what these customary and appropriate endorsements or assignments might be, and why the [[Manufactured payments in respect of Loaned Securities - GMSLA Provision|manufacturer]] has to grant them, even where the actual securities issuer didn’t, we can only speculate. Perhaps — speculation here — it is because the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is most likely to have immediately sold the {{gmslaprov|Loaned Securities}} into the market — the major purpose of a {{Gmsla}} being short selling, after all — and so won’t ''get'' any {{gmslaprov|Income}} under the shares, much less any “customary endorsements” relating to it, whatever in this day and age that might mean. | ||
The same goes — with less certainty, perhaps<ref>The {{gmslaprov|Lender}} isn’t acquiring the {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} with the express purpose of selling it, although it does acquire it by [[title transfer]] and absolutely is entitled to sell it.</ref> — for the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} of {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} that is has received by [[title transfer]]. So it would be interesting to contrast this with the equivalent provision in the {{pgmsla}}, wouldn’t it. | The same goes — with less certainty, perhaps<ref>The {{gmslaprov|Lender}} isn’t acquiring the {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} with the express purpose of selling it, although it does acquire it by [[title transfer]] and absolutely is entitled to sell it.</ref> — for the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} of {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} that is has received by [[title transfer]]. So it would be interesting to contrast this with the [[4.3 - Pledge GMSLA Provision|equivalent provision]] in the {{pgmsla}}, wouldn’t it. | ||
Let’s therefore go and do that. Back in a minute. | Let’s therefore go and do that. Back in a minute. | ||
Back! sure enough paragraph 4.3 of the {{pgmsla}} doesn’t mention {{pgmslaprov|Collateral}}, since it is never title transferred to the {{pgmslaprov|Lender}} in the first place. | |||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||