Depositary's obligations re safekeeping of assets - AIFMD Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 19: Line 19:
A [[prime broker]] to an {{aifmdprov|AIF}} ''could'' be its depositary, but for a bunch of reasons would most likely not be (for one thing, the depositary has to be domiciled in the same jurisdiction and the {{aifmdprov|AIF}}, and [[PB]]s tend to be domiciled in London, New York, Hong Kong etc, and not [[espievie]] jurisdictions; for another, there is an inherent conflict of interest between a depositary function and the [[margin lending]] relationship which is at the heart of what a PB does and how it makes money).  
A [[prime broker]] to an {{aifmdprov|AIF}} ''could'' be its depositary, but for a bunch of reasons would most likely not be (for one thing, the depositary has to be domiciled in the same jurisdiction and the {{aifmdprov|AIF}}, and [[PB]]s tend to be domiciled in London, New York, Hong Kong etc, and not [[espievie]] jurisdictions; for another, there is an inherent conflict of interest between a depositary function and the [[margin lending]] relationship which is at the heart of what a PB does and how it makes money).  


That said, {{aifmdprov|depositaries}} can ''delegate'' custody tasks to prime brokers provided that they meet certain conditions.
That said, {{aifmdprov|depositaries}} can ''delegate'' custody tasks to prime brokers provided that they meet certain conditions:
 
{{aifmddepositarydelegation}}
 
====Discharge of {{aifmdprov|depositary}}'s strict liability====
====Discharge of {{aifmdprov|depositary}}'s strict liability====
Upon delegation the {{aifmdprov|depositary}} remains strictly liable for loss caused by the sub-custodian. The depositary may discharge its liability if it can prove that:
Upon delegation the {{aifmdprov|depositary}} remains strictly liable for loss caused by the sub-custodian. The depositary may discharge its liability if it can prove that:
Line 31: Line 34:
The following will be deemed to be objective reasons:
The following will be deemed to be objective reasons:


{{Seealso}}
{{sa}}
*The {{aifmdprov|depo-lite}} regime which is applicable only to {{aifmdprov|Non-EU AIF}}s marketed on a private placement basis to professional investors (especially Article {{aifmdprov|36}}.
*The {{aifmdprov|depo-lite}} regime which is applicable only to {{aifmdprov|Non-EU AIF}}s marketed on a private placement basis to professional investors (especially Article {{aifmdprov|36}}.
*Also, for giggles, compare {{fcaprov|FUND 3.11.21R}} of the [[Investment Funds sourcebook]] which is the UK implementation of the {{tag|AIFMD}} directive:
{{ref}}
{{fundsnap|3.11.21R}}