Determination of Default Market Value - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{{nuts|gmsla|11.4}}
{{nuts|gmsla|11.4}}


Note that to determine a {{gmraprov|Default Market Value}} the counterparty must '''sell''' (''not'' buy) securities equivalent to those it is expecting back from a {{gmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}}. This, we think, is to ensure that the price is "real": the temptation otherwise would be for the {{gmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} to accept any old bid or offer, safe in the knowledge it can pass the cost on to the {{gmslaprov|Defaulting Party}}.
Note that to determine a {{gmslaprov|Default Market Value}} the counterparty must '''sell''' (''not'' buy) securities equivalent to those it is expecting back from a {{gmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}}. This, we think, is to ensure that the price is "real": the temptation otherwise would be for the {{gmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} to accept any old bid or offer, safe in the knowledge it can pass the cost on to the {{gmslaprov|Defaulting Party}}.


Tricks to watch out for, especially in illiquid stocks, is that the NDP is not somehow influencing the price at which a third party might transact (by agreeing to enter an offsetting transaction at the same time). THat would be fraudulent, of course.
Tricks to watch out for, especially in illiquid stocks, is that the {{gmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} is not somehow influencing the price at which that innocent third party might transact (by agreeing to enter an offsetting transaction at the same time). That would be fraudulent, of course.