82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
To put it briefly, the further away the ditch, the more resolutely one will declare one’s intention to die in it. | To put it briefly, the further away the ditch, the more resolutely one will declare one’s intention to die in it. | ||
The JC is working on a theory that — no doubt, among other things — this may explain why the output of industry-crafted standard forms is so hideous. Because they are necessarily negotiated in the abstract, there are any number of ''hypothetical'' ditches — for this sort of thing the [[legal eagle]] has an unrivalled imagination — but since there is no actual transaction in the offing; it is a purely conceptual project — | The [[JC]] is working on a theory that — no doubt, among other things — this may explain why the output of industry-crafted standard forms is so hideous. Because they are necessarily negotiated in the abstract, there are any number of ''hypothetical'' ditches — for this sort of thing, the [[legal eagle]] has an unrivalled imagination — but since there is no actual transaction in the offing; it is a purely conceptual project — all ditches are infinitely far away, none poses any risk of ever coming closer, so every member will therefore be prepared to die in every one. | ||
Hence {{icds}} — not to pick on them, but they are an awfully good example — has a ditch tolerance of nil and a ditch proximity of infinity. | Hence {{icds}} — not to pick on them, but they are an awfully good example — has a [[ditch tolerance]] of nil and a [[ditch proximity]] of infinity. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} |