|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{eqderivanat|10.1}} | | {{manual|DEQ|2002|10.1|Section||medium}} |
| There may be a whole section of the {{eqderivdefs}} on the topic<ref>See Section {{eqderivprov|10}}</ref>, but never do the grand masters of ISDA — the lords of derivative rock themselves — actually ''define'' “{{eqderivprov|Dividend}}”. Which is great when a company is ordered to pay something that ''looks'' like a dividend but, you know, might not be.
| |
| | |
| {{sa}}
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Dividend}}
| |
| *Section {{eqderivprov|10}} - {{eqderivprov|Dividends}}
| |
| | |
| {{ref}}
| |