Donoghue v Stevenson: Difference between revisions

Donoghue v Stevenson (view source)

219 bytes added , 29 October 2018

no edit summary

82,891

edits

Revision as of 17:47, 29 October 2018 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "{{cite\|Donoghue\|Stevenson\|1932\|AC\|532}} is a case so beloved of law students that the 1932 volume of the Appeals Cases falls open at page 532. Along with the leaking resevoir...")		Revision as of 17:57, 29 October 2018 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{cite\|Donoghue\|Stevenson\|1932\|AC\|532}} is a case so beloved of law students that the 1932 volume of the Appeals Cases falls open at page 532. Along with the leaking resevoir of {{casenote\|Rylands\|Fletcher}} it is one of the founding cases of the law of {{tag\|negligence}}.		{{cite\|Donoghue\|Stevenson\|1932\|AC\|532}} is a case so beloved of law students that the 1932 volume of the Appeals Cases falls open at page 532. Along with the leaking resevoir of {{casenote\|Rylands\|Fletcher}} it is one of the founding cases of the law of {{tag\|negligence}}.

			*Spod fact: I own a copy of the 1932 Appeals Cases, but evidently it has not seen active service in any library populated by live students, apparently has never been read, and so it doesn't fall open at page 532. Yet.