82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us - Book Review to Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|book review| | {{a|book review| | ||
[[File:Candle donut.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[candle problem]] and a [[donut]], yesterday.]] | [[File:Candle donut.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[candle problem]] and a [[donut]], yesterday.]] | ||
}}Despite the burgeoning suspicion of popular psych books that are subtitled “''The Surprising ~ ''”,<ref>For example, since you ask, {{br|Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us}}, {{br|Alchemy: The Surprising Power of Ideas that | }}Despite the burgeoning suspicion of popular psych books that are subtitled “''The Surprising ~ ''”,<ref>For example, since you ask, {{br|Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us}}, {{br|Alchemy: The Surprising Power of Ideas that Don’t Make Sense}}, {{br|The Dorito Effect: The Surprising New Truth About Food and Flavor}}, {{br|The Surprising Science of Meetings}}, to name but four.</ref> and despite the truth about what motivates us ''not'' being that surprising — I mean, who ''doesn’t'' want “autonomy, mastery, and purpose” in love, life and vocation? — {{author|Daniel Pink}}’s {{br|Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us}} is a timely and rewarding book — especially now, in this mad COVID inflexion point, where the world is up-ended, research programmes are in crisis, all bets are off and — who knows? — perhaps this time [[This time is different|it might really be different]]<ref>It won’t be.</ref> and we might finally be moving to some new sunlit upland [[paradigm]] of enlightened employment. | ||
As he does in his TED talk, in Drive, Pink frames his narrative around the psychological experiment: the [[candle problem]] challenges participants to figure out how to attach a lighted candle to a wall so that no wax gets on the floor, using only matches and a tray of tacks. Gestalt psychologist Karl Duncker correctly predicted the participants would, through “functional fixedness”, regard the cardboard tray as only a container for the thumbtacks and not otherwise relevant to the problem and would struggler to see a simple solution: tack the tray to the wall, and put the candle on the tray. Solving the problem requires a small amount of lateral thinking, to overcome the “functional fixedness”. | As he does in his TED talk, in Drive, Pink frames his narrative around the psychological experiment: the [[candle problem]] challenges participants to figure out how to attach a lighted candle to a wall so that no wax gets on the floor, using only matches and a tray of tacks. Gestalt psychologist Karl Duncker correctly predicted the participants would, through “functional fixedness”, regard the cardboard tray as only a container for the thumbtacks and not otherwise relevant to the problem and would struggler to see a simple solution: tack the tray to the wall, and put the candle on the tray. Solving the problem requires a small amount of lateral thinking, to overcome the “functional fixedness”. |