83,106
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page E-Discovery to E-discovery) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil|}}The [[JC]] rarely strays into matters of [[litigation]], regarding court-based resolution of commercial disputes as a kind of admission of liability in itself. | {{a|devil| | ||
[[File:Discovery in Antarctic.png|450px|thumb|center|Discovery before the information revolution]] | |||
}}The [[JC]] rarely strays into matters of [[litigation]], regarding court-based resolution of commercial disputes as a kind of admission of liability in itself. | |||
But civil procedure is an interesting prism for a (literally) disinterested observer to view the promise — or existential threat — of [[legaltech]]. For while there are as many reasons for ''la révolution tardive'' as there are [[thought leader]]s to formulate them — more, in fact — all are as one when reaching for examples of how legal technology has already changed things for the better: [https://www.google.com/search?q=ediscovery+has+revolutionised+the+legal+profession e-Discovery is the anecdote of choice]. | But civil procedure is an interesting prism for a (literally) disinterested observer to view the promise — or existential threat — of [[legaltech]]. For while there are as many reasons for ''la révolution tardive'' as there are [[thought leader]]s to formulate them — more, in fact — all are as one when reaching for examples of how legal technology has already changed things for the better: [https://www.google.com/search?q=ediscovery+has+revolutionised+the+legal+profession e-Discovery is the anecdote of choice]. |