Eagle Squad: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|work|[[File:Eagle Squad.png|450px|thumb|center|Licence to [[Die in a ditch|die... ''in a ditch'']].]]
{{a|work|[[File:Eagle Squad.png|450px|thumb|center|Licence to [[Die in a ditch|die... ''in a ditch'']].]]}}The brave men and women of the [[General Counsel|GCHQ]], here to save the world.  
}}The brave men and women of the GCHQ, here to save the world. They have a unique empowerment from gthe highest reaches of the great modernist machine. James Bond’s famous [[licence to kill]], but — let’s face facts — there is only so much you can do with that. Once you have bumped off Scaramanga that’s really that. But whereas the poor [[negotiator]]s really, the brave footsoldiers of legal practice in our modern world, however hotly the eaglery denies it — have constraints on the degree of perversity they can bring to their task: they have [[metric]]s, [[service level agreement]]s, [[KPI]]s — all manner of ornate modernist fripperies by which their overlords can impel them to carry on, propelling them to find solutions, make accommodations, engineer compromises and basically box on — the Eagle Squad member has no such constraint. She can resist a [[Sovereign immunity|sovereign immunity waiver]] from an industrial corporate having no particular association with any State indefinitely, on principle, with no second-guessing and cajoling from the cheap-suits in Sales. This is ineffable legal stuff; the risks of compromise passeth all muggle comprehending, and that is that. Our Legal Squad has not a licence to kill so much as a ''licence to [[die in a ditch]]''.
 
Legal eagles have unique empowerment from the highest reaches of the great [[modernist]] machine.  
 
Now, James Bond famously had a [[licence to kill]], but — let’s face facts — there is only so much you can do with that. Once you have bumped off Scaramanga that’s really that.  
 
[[Eagle Squad]]’s power is more of a torture of the living. Whereas others in the legal documentation flow — notably, the poor benighted [[negotiator]]s who are, really, the brave footsoldiers of legal practice, however hotly the [[eaglery]] denies it — have meaningful commercial constraints on the perversity they can bring to their task: there are measurements of their performance, and abstrusity doesn’t count: their [[metric]]s, [[service level agreement]]s, [[KPI]]s — the whole ornate ''smörgåsbord'' of [[modernist]] fripperies by which their overlords can impel them to carry on, propelling them to find solutions, make accommodations, engineer compromises and basically box on — the Eagle Squad member has no such constraint.  
 
She can resist a [[Sovereign immunity|sovereign immunity waiver]] from an industrial corporate having no particular association with any organ of state indefinitely, on principle, notwithstanding the fatuity of the request — indeed, ''because'' of the fatuity of the request! — with no second-guessing or cajoling from the cheap-seats.  
 
This is ineffable legal stuff; the risks of compromise passeth all [[muggle]] comprehending, and that is that. Eagle Squad has not so much a licence to ''kill'' as a ''licence to [[die in a ditch]]''.
 
{{sa}}
*[[Modernism]]
*[[Dashboard]]
*[[Ditch tolerance]]