82,900
edits
Electronic execution: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The unglamorous but important topic of [[electronic execution]] usually gets swamped by modish [[A.I.]] [[yogababble]] — though old [[Jolly Contrarian|Mystic Meg]] here predicts that might change in 2020 with the planet’s entire [[Negotiator|negotiation capability]] [[Coronavirus|sequestered in box rooms and attics]], without any other means of executing legal contracts. | The unglamorous but important topic of [[electronic execution]] usually gets swamped by modish [[A.I.]] [[yogababble]] — though old [[Jolly Contrarian|Mystic Meg]] here predicts that might change in 2020 with the planet’s entire [[Negotiator|negotiation capability]] [[Coronavirus|sequestered in box rooms and attics]], without any other means of executing legal contracts. | ||
For a properly-implemented electronic execution programme will not just keep your [[ISDA ninja]]s safe from [[Coronavirus|pandemic]], but will yield productivity and data control benefits which will exceed all reasonable expectation< | For a properly-implemented electronic execution programme will not just keep your [[ISDA ninja]]s safe from [[Coronavirus|pandemic]], but will yield productivity and data control benefits which will exceed all reasonable expectation<ref>Until, after six months, everyone just takes them for granted, like usual.</ref>. This, [[Jolly Contrarian|Mystic Meg]] feels, will be far more [[transformative]] than a slew of useless [[chatbot]]s or for that matter the forthcoming [[Singularity]], in which said useless [[chatbot|chatbots]] are expected to take over and convert we weeping mortal [[Meatsack|fleshsacks]] into battery juice. | ||
Electronic execution is just not as ''sexy''. | Electronic execution is just not as ''sexy''. | ||