82,903
edits
Electronic execution: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
For a properly-implemented electronic execution programme will not just keep your [[ISDA ninja]]s safe from [[Coronavirus|pandemic]], but will yield productivity and data control benefits which will exceed all expectations.<ref>Until, after six months, everyone just takes them for granted, like usual.</ref> This, [[Jolly Contrarian|Mystic Meg]] feels, will be far more [[transformative]] than a slew of useless [[chatbot]]s or, for that matter, the forthcoming [[Singularity]], in which said useless [[chatbot|chatbots]] take over and convert we weeping mortal [[Meatsack|fleshsacks]] into battery juice. | For a properly-implemented electronic execution programme will not just keep your [[ISDA ninja]]s safe from [[Coronavirus|pandemic]], but will yield productivity and data control benefits which will exceed all expectations.<ref>Until, after six months, everyone just takes them for granted, like usual.</ref> This, [[Jolly Contrarian|Mystic Meg]] feels, will be far more [[transformative]] than a slew of useless [[chatbot]]s or, for that matter, the forthcoming [[Singularity]], in which said useless [[chatbot|chatbots]] take over and convert we weeping mortal [[Meatsack|fleshsacks]] into battery juice. | ||
That is to say | That is to say, [[electronic execution]] is much-needed and long-overdue innovation. It’s just not ''sexy''. | ||
Now, before allaying the usual pat paranoid fears about it, a brief, self-indulgent foray into the [[common law]] [[jurisprudence]] of the [[contract]]: | Now, before allaying the usual pat paranoid fears about it, a brief, self-indulgent foray into the [[common law]] [[jurisprudence]] of the [[contract]]: | ||