82,886
edits
Empowerment: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil|}}Less in the sense of touchy-feely [[yogababble]] about how we should all be actualised to [[Be the best version of yourself|be the best versions of ourselves]], but in the sense of having the autonomy and authority to make pragmatic decisions to move an organisation on. | {{a|devil|}}Less in the sense of touchy-feely [[yogababble]] about how we should all be actualised to [[Be the best version of yourself|be the best versions of ourselves]], but in the sense of having the autonomy and authority to make pragmatic decisions to move an organisation your own part of your own organisation ''on''. | ||
Our working theory is the immutable trajectory of modern management orthodoxy, flavouring policy over expert judgment, process over insight, evidence over intuition, fundamentally '' substance'' over ''form''— pushes each enterprise towards ultimate ''stasis'' which will only collapse when the firm does, as a result of some tail-risk non-linear chain reaction your [[risk taxonomy]] somehow didn't contemplate. | |||
In any commercial collective, there is an enduring tussle between the (sadly) resistible force of [[subject matter expert]]ise — wielded limply by those who know what they are doing, understand the proximate ramifications of their actions and derive professional pride and no small amount of job satisfaction from ''the very act of exercising small nuggets of authority'' — and the hardly moveable object of [[policy]], process, [[precedent]] and sclerotic infrastructure that trusts no such executive agent further than she can be thrown, and is stout in the resistance of any kind of risk, however theoretical or academic. | In any commercial collective, there is an enduring tussle between the (sadly) resistible force of [[subject matter expert]]ise — wielded limply by those who know what they are doing, understand the proximate ramifications of their actions and derive professional pride and no small amount of job satisfaction from ''the very act of exercising small nuggets of authority'' — and the hardly moveable object of [[policy]], process, [[precedent]] and sclerotic infrastructure that trusts no such executive agent further than she can be thrown, and is stout in the resistance of any kind of risk, however theoretical or academic. | ||