82,910
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
“[[Endeavour]]” neatly illustrates the practical problem with plain English. It is a silly word: long; archaic; it conjures images of Captain Spaulding, in a pith helmet, slashing through jungle in the Congo on the hunt for Dr. Livingstone. Its alternative — “[[try]]” — is better in every way that a plain speaker cares about: shorter, more idiomatic, plainer, less fussy. | |||
But there lies the problem: “[[try]]” slices cleanly through the semantic murk that “[[endeavour]]” so skillfully stirs up. It makes clear something the [[Mediocre you|draftsman]] rather hoped to obscure: namely, that this is a feeble covenant, | But there, Dr. Livingstone I presume, lies the problem: “[[try]]” slices cleanly through the semantic murk that “[[endeavour]]” so skillfully stirs up. It makes clear something the [[Mediocre you|draftsman]] rather hoped to obscure: namely, that this is a feeble covenant, not worth the paper it is written on. | ||
Consider these alternatives: | Consider these alternatives: |