Environmental, social and corporate governance: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}Soup du jour. Ideal fodder for that client webinar. And if you are worried you have unhedged risk to it, well — there are always [[turpitude swap|turpitude swaps]] to see you right.
{{a|devil|[[File:Polar bear.png|450px|frameless|center]]}}Soup du jour. Ideal fodder for that [[Law firm seminar|client webinar]]. And if you are worried you have unhedged risk to it, well — there are always [[turpitude swap|turpitude swaps]] to see you right.


Call me an old, unreconstructed gammon but — seriously, financial services multinationals? — If you care about environment, society and governance, put a sock in your [[virtue signalling]] and pay your sodding [[taxes]].
Call me an old, unreconstructed gammon but — ''seriously'', financial services multinationals? — If you care about environment, society and governance, put a sock in your [[virtue signalling]] and pay your sodding [[taxes]].


Of course, ESG is becoming more of a thing, more investment managers have it in their mandates, as a marketing device, or they are obliged to meet sustainability targets, by regulation, then the basic wrongheadedness of stakeholder capitalism rears its head. We see we are creating a monster that will not vouchsafe ''any'' improvement in the environment, but will open yet another front for the [[regulatory-industrial complex]] to occupy, and [[Rent-extraction|extract rent]] from.  
Of course, the point where [[ESG]] jumped the tracks from being a means of virtue-signalling ones neo-puritanical credentials to the [[Get off Twitter|twittersphere]] to being a regulated, articulated objective of large tracts of the financial services industry — now it has moved beyond a mere marketing device and investment managers have published it in their mandates, and they are even are obliged by ''regulation'' to meet sustainability targets rather than that quaint old-fashioned notion of, you know, return — then the basic wrongheadedness of [[stakeholder capitalism]] rears its head. We are creating a monster that will not vouchsafe ''any'' improvement in the environment, but will open yet another front for the [[regulatory-industrial complex]] to occupy, and [[Rent-extraction|extract rent]] from the disempowered retirees of the world.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*{{br|Car Guys vs. Bean Counters: The Battle for the Soul of American Business}}
*[[Stakeholder capitalism]]
*[[Stakeholder capitalism]]
*[[Rent extraction]]
*[[Rent extraction]]
*[[Agency problem]]
*[[Agency problem]]