Epicycle: Difference between revisions

No change in size ,  19 January 2021
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|cosmology|450px|thumb|center|An [[ad hoc hypothesis yesterday.]]}}In Ptolemaic and other geocentric astronomies, epicycles were necessary fea...")
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Of course it later became apparent that the planets weren’t orbiting the Earth at all, but were prescribing simple, lazy ellipses around the sun.
Of course it later became apparent that the planets weren’t orbiting the Earth at all, but were prescribing simple, lazy ellipses around the sun.


Why mention this on a wiki largely devoted to complaining about modern legal practice in financial services? Because of its ''metaphorical power'', or course. The existence of epicycles was classic “[[ad hoc hypothesis]]” — a desperate attempt to shore up a research programme that was otherwise in crisis, because no-one wants to give up a cosmological theory that has worked perfectly well for twelve centuries.
Why mention this on a wiki largely devoted to complaining about modern legal practice in financial services? Because of its ''metaphorical power'', of course. The existence of epicycles was classic “[[ad hoc hypothesis]]” — a desperate attempt to shore up a research programme that was otherwise in crisis, because no-one wants to give up a cosmological theory that has worked perfectly well for twelve centuries.




{{c2|Astrophysics|Metaphor}}
{{c2|Astrophysics|Metaphor}}