Equitable remedy: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}A remedy under {{t|contract}} developed by the [[courts of chancery]] as a way of addressing the manifold injustices of a doctrinaire application of the [[common law]] of {{t|contract}}. Sometimes [[damages]] ain’t enough, you see (where contractual [[privity]] is a harsh mistress; also frequently under a [[confidentiality agreement]]).
{{a|contract|}}A remedy under {{t|contract}} developed by the [[courts of chancery]] as a way of addressing the manifold injustices of a doctrinaire application of the [[common law]] of {{t|contract}}. Sometimes [[damages]] ain’t enough, you see (where contractual [[privity]] is a harsh mistress; also frequently under a [[confidentiality agreement]]).


Types of [[equitable remedy]] include:
So, “M’lud I don’t want money. I want this blighter to ''stop'' doing what he’s doing, that he promised me he ''wouldn’t'' do (injunction), or ''start'' doing what he’s not doing, if he said he ''would'' (specific performance), or account to me for stuff he shouldn’t have ever got in the first place (restitution) (okay in this case I ''do'' want money).”
*[[Injunction]]
 
*[[Specific performance]]
===[[Injunction]]===
*[[Restitution]]
{{injunction capsule}}
===[[Specific performance]]===
{{specific performance capsule}}
===[[Restitution]]===
{{restitution capsule}}