81,836
edits
Event of default: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|glossary|}}Sometimes known as an [[enforcement event]], an [[event of default]] is an action a counterparty takes which justifies the innocent party | {{a|glossary|}}Sometimes known as an [[enforcement event]], an [[event of default]] is an action a counterparty takes which justifies the innocent party terminating the contract ''under its terms'', [[close out|closing out]] open transactions, and raining down fiery hell on the wronger and its affiliates, directors, officers, employees, agents and delegates. | ||
It has a different consequence to a [[repudiatory breach|repudiatory, or fundamental, breach]] of contract, even though the two are largely the same, and a “repudiation of contract” may even be characterised as am event of default. | |||
{{Event of default vs fundamental breach}} | |||
===Under the [[master agreements|master trading agreements]]=== | ===Under the [[master agreements|master trading agreements]]=== | ||
There is specific idiosyncratic lore attaching to the events of default under differing market standard master agreements, so go with alacrity to: | There is specific idiosyncratic lore attaching to the events of default under differing market standard master agreements, so go with alacrity to: | ||